These are excerpts from an article in Front Page Magazine. It's a very long article, and I have tried to grab just the heart of it.
The article was a rebuttal to an article by Michael Isikoff on the recent book on the Iraq War by David Horowitz (with Peter Collier). The first part of the article is Michael Isikoff's book review, the second (parts of which are quoted below) is the answer to the charges by FrontPage Magazine.
"The real question for critics like Michael Isikoff, who oppose the war, is this: Do they believe that if the
"The real issue is what the Democrats knew about the intelligence debate, not the public. The Democrats voted to use force, endorsed the war, and then within three months - three months! - turned against it and attacked it calling their own country an aggressor nation, their president a liar who sent American youth to die for no reason, and U.S. troops bloody occupiers and war criminals. In defense of this betrayal, the Democrats claim that Bush manipulated the intelligence and deceived them. But this is demonstrably false. It is itself the biggest lie of the war. As the major opposition party in a democratic nation, the Democrats had full access to the intelligence debate and participated in it. Isikoff's confusion of "the public" with the Democratic leadership has the effect of amplifying the confusion that sustains the Democrats' claim that they were duped."
"But unlike the public, the Democrats had access to all the intelligence information the government had. The Senate Intelligence Committee oversees the CIA and
To me, the bottom line here is simple. We are fighting a war on terror, and one political party has consistently undermined OUR Commander-in-Chief and his ability to conduct that war. If you read the old Communist Party documents on how to defeat a country, their first aim is "if you cut off the head of the snake, the snake dies". We need to be very careful about what we say and do at this time. We live in a very dangerous world, and it's not always about us or our politics.
I have linked to the entire article above--it is interesting reading.
Wonderful benefit towards the UGG boot could be the comfort level. Good quality footwear not only lasts longer, it feels wonderful too, and a lot more importantly it and doesn't harm your feet like so many of the other stylish shoes and boots around nowadays, specifically within the winter.
UGG boots for ladies provide a high degree of comfort as they include luxurious Australian sheepskin which is universally deemed to be the top material in keeping warm. Women' s feet will remain warm even in bitter cold winter in these boots. ugg boots uk ugg boots uk Besides uggs for men uggs for men, the superior sheepskin also has the capacity to absorb moisture ugg.com ugg.com, keeping feet dry and comfortable all day lengthy. Additionally to ultra warmth and comfort, these shoes also feature wonderful durability and ideal fit, producing them best for ladies. ugg boots ugg boots